Back to main menu :: [Prev] won't someone please think of the children? [Next]

Porn filters for libraries A-OK, says Supreme Court. Pervy sickos looking for breast cancer information are now SOL.

Hey, here's an idea: How about, instead of requiring filters that decide what everyone can see online at the library, parents protect their kids from porn by, y'know, keeping an eye on them or something? Librarians are not supposed to be babysitters.

Must everything in our culture be acceptable to eight-year-olds?

Replies: 1 Confession

Although I can think of worse things than library censorship (rape, torture, Jason Giambi on how women don't sweat), most of them are not subject of Supreme Court rulings and when they are, the justices don't usually rule them O-OK. Grrrrr.

elavil @ 06/23/2003 11:07 AM CST


Add A New Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (required)

Homepage (optional)

Remember personal info?

Comments